Anon - not logged in Report This Comment
Date: August 04, 2025 12:40PM

I was browsing a totally useless article on AI by a cartoonist: [afteralex.substack.com]

I puzzle someone with a philosophy degree would write about AI, when it really should be done by someone with knowledge of computers. In short:

AI 1.0 is just the yank Department of Defence wanting everyone else's stories, histories and ideas to match yank ones. See! World America! Just like their funding of yank companies to take over discussions on the internet (Alphabet and so on), it's far more important than weapons advances... Now you know what's about to happen.

It's just a collating exercise and the catch is: whom selects the sources? Before you write pages of conspiracy theory, it's now a known fact that AI trained on AI produced content generates rubbish. You can add the yank idea that AI 1.0 was originally for to Race and Gate. Impossible.

That's impossible, no matter how often you plus one to the right, as is the only way AI 1.0 is going. Strange, that 'Who pays the piper calls the tune' outlives monumental expense on technology...

This type of AI requires the house brick size Nvidia chips. The yanks thought they had the control of AI by controlling the company that makes those chips. That's so retarded...

AI 2.0 can be done by the chip in your desktop computer, 3 Gigahertz is more than enough. It's a maths equation, of the type you did at school, that could be thousands of separate calculations long, or millions, and thousands deep. People are finding more and more uses for it.

Anon - not logged in Report This Comment
Date: October 08, 2025 11:01PM

As I said, here:

[www.plus613.net]

and here:

[www.afr.com]

Note this last one means sovereign/organisational control of sources.